*The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings* - Page 31 - Techist - Tech Forum

Go Back   Techist - Tech Forum > Computer Hardware > Overclocking and Modding
Click Here to Login
Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
 
Old 05-22-2010, 07:11 AM   #301 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Apokalipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,559
Default Re: *The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings*

My friend is borrowing my 8800 GT
He'll be around tomorrow, where I'll be attempting to flash it to a 9800 GT.
I might see if I can get a better score with it in hybrid PhysX
__________________

__________________
Apokalipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 09:06 PM   #302 (permalink)
Grand Tinker
 
cq842000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New York
Posts: 346
Send a message via Yahoo to cq842000
Default Re: *The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings*

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apokalipse View Post
My friend is borrowing my 8800 GT
He'll be around tomorrow, where I'll be attempting to flash it to a 9800 GT.
I might see if I can get a better score with it in hybrid PhysX
I used the same technique on the 8800GT, worked fine. I had a friend next door to me brick his though. I cant wait to see your score with Hybrid PhysX. Best of luck to you man.
__________________

__________________
...Unda..Bestia...
MountainMods Ascension | EVGA X58 4xSLI Classified | Intel Core i7 980X | Swiftech/EK/Feser Liquid Cooling | 12 GB G.Skill Ripjaw 2000 DDR3 | 2x Sapphire Radeon HD6990 (core 1ghz/memory 1.5ghz) + GTX 460 for PhysX
| 2x WD 640 GB 7200rpm HDDs | Antec True Power Quattro 1200w + Antec True Power Quattro 1000w |

cq842000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2010, 09:35 PM   #303 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Apokalipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,559
Default Re: *The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings*

I just got 4.6GHz in superpi 1M
Maybe that means I can get 4.5GHz in 3dmark, or close to it.
We'll see...
__________________
Apokalipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2010, 03:15 AM   #304 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Apokalipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,559
Default Re: *The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings*

 


P24,237 | Apokalipse | Phenom II X6 1090T @ 4.407GHz | HD5870 @ 1100/1290 + 8800 GT @ 675/1688/972 (Hybrid PhysX) | W7 x64 | ORB
__________________
Apokalipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2010, 04:16 AM   #305 (permalink)
Lord Techie
 
S0ULphIRE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Australia
Posts: 8,659
Send a message via MSN to S0ULphIRE
Default Re: *The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings*

^pic not showing
__________________
"As a result of all this hardship, dirt, thirst, and wombats, you would expect Australians to be a sour lot. Instead, they are genial, jolly, cheerful, and always willing to share a kind word with a stranger, unless they are an American." -- Douglas Adams
S0ULphIRE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2010, 05:37 AM   #306 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Apokalipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,559
Default Re: *The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings*

Quote:
Originally Posted by S0ULphIRE View Post
^pic not showing
Fixed.
__________________
Apokalipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 11:15 AM   #307 (permalink)
 
patonb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Gov't Regulated Cubical
Posts: 9,745
Default Re: The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings

P19302 | PatonB| Q6600@ 3.1ghz | SLI GTX 260-216 @ 676/1160 | Vista 64bit ORB

Finally after a year and as half, I sli'd my cards and tweaked them. I ran into a shader wall I think, can't fold past it, but will tweak some more later.

However... Comparing to gurusans i5 750@ 4Ghz build and sli'd 260's, we are only 1000pts away and 1 driver revision.

His gpu kills me at over 4000, 20494 vs my 16866, with a better over clock,
But
My lowely 3.1 Ghz q6600 KILLS his 4Ghz i5 750 by ~ 15000, 19759 vs my 34054.

Hows that possible? He is running vantage ver 1.0.2 vs my 1.0.1.... Is that a difference?
__________________
Foldie = i5 6600kMSI Z170A M5 EVGA 970 SC Corsair H100 Corsair hx520 2x8gb GSkill Corsair 650D
Woohoo = L5639 @3.1Ghz EVGA SR-2 gtx 260-216 Hyper 212+ Corsair 1050hx 6x2gb Corsair XMS3 Blackhawk Ulra
Alienware 18 - SLI 770M 4700mq 16Gig

patonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 11:19 AM   #308 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Apokalipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,559
Default Re: The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by patonb View Post
My lowely 3.1 Ghz q6600 KILLS his 4Ghz i5 750 by ~ 15000, 19759 vs my 34054.

Hows that possible? He is running vantage ver 1.0.2 vs my 1.0.1.... Is that a difference?
Because PhysX
__________________
Apokalipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 01:20 PM   #309 (permalink)
 
patonb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: In Gov't Regulated Cubical
Posts: 9,745
Default Re: The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by Apokalipse View Post
Because PhysX
I though that too, but his driver would/should have acted the same way, being just 1 rev away.

I actually ran a run with old 187 drivers and then the 257 drivers and it barely made a difference.

Guru, run it again with the newest drivers please
__________________
Foldie = i5 6600kMSI Z170A M5 EVGA 970 SC Corsair H100 Corsair hx520 2x8gb GSkill Corsair 650D
Woohoo = L5639 @3.1Ghz EVGA SR-2 gtx 260-216 Hyper 212+ Corsair 1050hx 6x2gb Corsair XMS3 Blackhawk Ulra
Alienware 18 - SLI 770M 4700mq 16Gig

patonb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 01:27 PM   #310 (permalink)
Techie Beyond Description
 
Apokalipse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 14,559
Default Re: The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark Vantage Rankings

Quote:
Originally Posted by patonb View Post
I though that too, but his driver would/should have acted the same way, being just 1 rev away.

I actually ran a run with old 187 drivers and then the 257 drivers and it barely made a difference.

Guru, run it again with the newest drivers please
PhysX can be enabled or disabled.
__________________

__________________
Apokalipse is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Tech Forums Official Crysis [Warhead] GPU Benchmark Thread gurusan Overclocking and Modding 543 03-12-2010 12:32 AM
The *Official* Tech Forums Member Case Gallery Burn Overclocking and Modding 5 01-25-2010 02:06 PM
Attention all Tech Forums members Larry Forum Admin, Announcements & Feedback 13 12-27-2009 06:05 PM
Intel graphics drivers employ questionable 3DMark Vantage optimizations Trotter Monitors, Printers and Peripherals 0 10-13-2009 02:42 PM



Copyright 2002- Social Knowledge, LLC All Rights Reserved.

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8 Beta 1
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.