Nagasama
disgruntled ex-moderator
- Messages
- 6,956
- Location
- probably on the lake
i have a different opinion
i believe the 6300 would be about the same as a x2 3800. at the very best, close to my cpu...at stock speeds, mind you.
but i definitely agree w/ eclipse... your mobo limits your o.c. ability.
i am limited to 2.65ish with mine, BUT it cost 80 bucks, not 150.
i have read articles detailing the ability to oc the 4200 to 2.8 with no voltage increase with a certain foxconn board.
could possibly go to 3-3.2 with a VERY good overclocking motherboard, and alot of tweaking and testing (and a big zalman haha) jingle bells jingle bells...
and once again, i agree with eclipse, i agree that mobo will limit the overclock, and i myself am limiting the potential of my cpu. i bought my mobo b/c it was tried and true and had a chipset that was all but guaranteed to be stable (nf4). do your homework...
the only problem i had choosing between the 6300 and the 4200, and i looked at them both very closely, was that i saw many times in this forum and in others the inconsistency of the overclocks of the intels.
ie. some people could get 3.2, others could get 2.6 with the same set-up. granted, this could be from lack of knowledge or experience...or lack of desire to go to the limit.
but i achieved the overclock i expected (actually a little above) with my current set up. and also as expected, stable...i can run prime95 on both cores for 24 hours no sweat.
what i am liking lately in the forums here is the recognition given to both companies for their cpu's...not just, "buy brand x, i've got it and i know everything"...
either one of these cpus are EXCELLENT. it really depends on your personal preference, but do your homework...
if you are just beginning, maybe you should go with one of these less expensive cpu to experiment with your overclock. jeez...by the time you get it in the mail, it will be obsolete. haha.
good luck, man!
TriEclipse said:
See, at stock speeds, the E6300 is around the performance of a A64 X2 4600+.
i believe the 6300 would be about the same as a x2 3800. at the very best, close to my cpu...at stock speeds, mind you.
but i definitely agree w/ eclipse... your mobo limits your o.c. ability.
i am limited to 2.65ish with mine, BUT it cost 80 bucks, not 150.
i have read articles detailing the ability to oc the 4200 to 2.8 with no voltage increase with a certain foxconn board.
could possibly go to 3-3.2 with a VERY good overclocking motherboard, and alot of tweaking and testing (and a big zalman haha) jingle bells jingle bells...
and once again, i agree with eclipse, i agree that mobo will limit the overclock, and i myself am limiting the potential of my cpu. i bought my mobo b/c it was tried and true and had a chipset that was all but guaranteed to be stable (nf4). do your homework...
the only problem i had choosing between the 6300 and the 4200, and i looked at them both very closely, was that i saw many times in this forum and in others the inconsistency of the overclocks of the intels.
ie. some people could get 3.2, others could get 2.6 with the same set-up. granted, this could be from lack of knowledge or experience...or lack of desire to go to the limit.
but i achieved the overclock i expected (actually a little above) with my current set up. and also as expected, stable...i can run prime95 on both cores for 24 hours no sweat.
what i am liking lately in the forums here is the recognition given to both companies for their cpu's...not just, "buy brand x, i've got it and i know everything"...
either one of these cpus are EXCELLENT. it really depends on your personal preference, but do your homework...
if you are just beginning, maybe you should go with one of these less expensive cpu to experiment with your overclock. jeez...by the time you get it in the mail, it will be obsolete. haha.
good luck, man!