hmm why am i bothering with my fx 60
- Thread starter jseber1982
- Start date
- Status
OP
OP
jseber1982
Enterprise SCCM\SCOM
- Messages
- 904
- Location
- Atlanta, Ga
oops sorry, i guess im in too much of a hurry huh? I will keep it in mind for future posts
I didn't read this, but if you have any questions about overclocking Intels, this might answer a few:
http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/1567-intel-overclocking-guide.html
http://www.overclock.net/intel-cpus/1567-intel-overclocking-guide.html
yeah idk...sure you could opt for a E6600 now but isn't your fx-60 plenty fast for what you'd be using it now? I mean you do what you want w/ ur money and i'm sure that you know more about computers than me considering your computer probably costs about double what mine did...
anyways what i'm saying is that i don't see how it's beneficial to get rid of a Fx-60 now instead of later on down the road. I'm just saying that processors are ahead of GPU's and ram right now but i guess that's about all you CAN upgrade at this point too.
anyways what i'm saying is that i don't see how it's beneficial to get rid of a Fx-60 now instead of later on down the road. I'm just saying that processors are ahead of GPU's and ram right now but i guess that's about all you CAN upgrade at this point too.
Nitestick
Golden Master
- Messages
- 8,478
- Location
- Ñмерти Ð´Ð»Ñ Ñпаме
not exactly. they're different technologies with different applications. GPUs are good for rendering videos (obviously
), parallel calculations (things like the F@H algorithm) and physics. CPUs are targeted for thread parallelism and GPUs for process parallelism in otherwords CPUs can run many things simultaneously and GPUs can run the same task in seperate parallel pieces simultaneously
OP
OP
jseber1982
Enterprise SCCM\SCOM
- Messages
- 904
- Location
- Atlanta, Ga
ok lol.... i got money to upgrade and i need something to upgrade, so it only makes sense to upgrade t conroe
- Status
Similar threads
