AMD Processor vs Intel Processor

Status
Not open for further replies.
the new Intel Core 2 duo is killing AMD, AMD responded to the new processor by saying they dont have an answer to the new processor atleast in 2006. also amds run extremely hot and fry almost instantly without proper cooling.
 
umm, AMD CPU's don't run hot. they run pretty cool. much cooler than anything Intel had before the Core 2 Duo came out.

and anyway, without proper cooling, any modern CPU would fry very quickly, unless the PC shut itself off.

yes, the Core 2 Duo runs cooler than what AMD has at the moment. that doesn't make AMD CPU's hot. it just means the Core 2 Duo is cool.
 
Does intel core X6800 have 4MB L2 cach memory on each core ? or the two cores have 4MB fs (2MB for each) ?

And Why they don't write 2x4MB or 2x2MB ?
IN pentium D they use to write 2x2MB, which mean that each core has 2MB of memory.
 
apokalipse said:
umm, AMD CPU's don't run hot. they run pretty cool. much cooler than anything Intel had before the Core 2 Duo came out.

and anyway, without proper cooling, any modern CPU would fry very quickly, unless the PC shut itself off.

yes, the Core 2 Duo runs cooler than what AMD has at the moment. that doesn't make AMD CPU's hot. it just means the Core 2 Duo is cool.

found this for you :)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XgOmMAasqto
 
AMD X2 FX60 64bit Dual Core Processor

Try playing games on the below system:

AMD X2 FX60 Dual Core Processor
(2.6ghz x 2 , 2 x 1mb cache)
ATI X850 GTO 16x PCI Express Video Card
 
ok just a heads up that i am probably going to become a moderating nazi, so in future for this thread [size=large]NO BANDWIDTH WASTERS[/size]

a bandwidth waster is a post that is:
a) not even a single complete sentence
b) sounds as if the writer is blind, drunk or blind drunk
c) has no reasoning deemed to be acceptable on this plane of existence

so no more "AMD rulz foolz" posts.
 
Generally, the definition is speed is misunderstood between people knocking procs on this forum.

Im talking pre-intel core 2
Do you need a fast response for front end processing like gaming and doc ?
AMD will do that because it has a short pipeline of only 14 rungs.

Do you need something with high bandwidth, low response, and lot of back end processing like rendering, compiling and compressing ?
Intel will do that, because the pipeline is double the length +2 rungs of amds (30 rungs). If each rung or stage of the pipeline is saturated, then it will outperform the AMD by more than 40%.

Now, the new procs.
AMD is still at 14 stages and 3 execution units.

Intel mirrored AMDs pipeline and added a fourth execution unit.

Basically, AMD is your typical generic, and cheap processor, like the people's processor, a ford fiesta, or VW beetle.

Its meant for front end, regular processing, but you get kicked in the pants when you try to do some back end....

FYI
AMD has a liscense from Intel to use the IA32, and IA32EXT(What amd calls AMD64).

I have a X2 and the core switching is terrible.
Its like you back in 1998, but now you have 2 procs.....

And lets not forget the Itanium 2 which basically sets Moores law.
AMD hasnt had anything to compete with that for a VERY long time.
And lets not forget the other generic IA32/IA32EXT liscensee, Cyrix...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom