Conroe Advice?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yoad said:
Uh huh.. and how can you not get caught?..

-Jo/

Because once the processor is out of the motherboard its no longer over clocked, and shows no evidence of being over clocked although it is damaged, the damage cause by the over clock is no different than the damage that can occur on a defective chip running at stock speed.
 
cedjunior said:
Because once the processor is out of the motherboard its no longer over clocked, and shows no evidence of being over clocked although it is damaged, the damage cause by the over clock is no different than the damage that can occur on a defective chip running at stock speed.

and are you sure of this?
 
Are you certain I always thought there was a little marker that informed them that someone fugged with their chip.
 
MrCoffee said:
can they not tell if its been damaged due to a higher voltage?
No


massacreinfallx said:
and are you sure of this?
Pretty much


JoshSB said:
Are you certain I always thought there was a little marker that informed them that someone fugged with their chip.
No such thing.

Unless there is physical damage like burn marks or crushed pins or cracks or whatever, there is no way to differentiate damaged caused by a defective chip from damage caused by over clocking. You can get a brand new precessor that is DOA and have to RMA it and it could possibly show the same defects as a processor that you burned out OC'ing too much. And if you have OC'd and never damaged the chip at all, there is absolutely no way it could be proven.
 
cedjunior said:
No


Pretty much


No such thing.

Unless there is physical damage like burn marks or crushed pins or cracks or whatever, there is no way to differentiate damaged caused by a defective chip from damage caused by over clocking. You can get a brand new precessor that is DOA and have to RMA it and it could possibly show the same defects as a processor that you burned out OC'ing too much. And if you have OC'd and never damaged the chip at all, there is absolutely no way it could be proven.

well alright then.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom