Alex81388 said:Yup. A brand new technology of intel's looks nicer than the older AMD's. Just like the newer AMD's looked nicer than the old intels... whats the big deal? In a little bit it will flip back again, then back again.
I'll wait until vista comes out and people actually make cores for it at that point really.
LOL I totally forgot about that!john3 said:k, yeah, AMD is very close.......if only they dropped the price by about $700!
cedjunior said:Pentium 4's came out in 2000, Athlon 64's came out in 2003. None of the AMD fans had any problem with talking about how the new Athlon 64's owned the (the 3 year old) Pentium 4 design. Flash to 2006, Athlon 64 design is 3 years old, Intel is about to debut a new processsor technology that will perform much better than the Athlon 64. All the AMD fan boys keep complaining that you can't compare old tech to new tech, even though thats all they've been doing since 2003.
AnthraX said:Humans are very competitive, even when they aren't the ones competing.
john3 said:i.......dont........think.........that possible.
Lord AnthraX said:Of course it is
Im a fan of a soccer team. Im being extremely competitive about my team even though Im merely watching from the stands.
Simple.
Never denied that. I was just saying that people made it seem like it was going to be ridiculous power, like 2x better in all benchmarks and whatnot, especially after they were watching fugger push that conroe to insane limits.Yeah, I knew people would say "But it doesn't beat it by that much!!!" and totally forget that the chip that doesn't beat it by that much also costs 1/2 as much.