T True_Orb Daemon Poster Messages 765 Mar 26, 2004 #12 Unless you don't care about wasting money I'd say go AMD. As a general rule: With Intel you get a barely noticeable increase in performance from an AMD for a HELL of a big increase in price.
Unless you don't care about wasting money I'd say go AMD. As a general rule: With Intel you get a barely noticeable increase in performance from an AMD for a HELL of a big increase in price.
T ThirtySixBelow Daemon Poster Messages 504 Mar 27, 2004 #13 As a general rule: With Intel you get a barely noticeable increase in performance from an AMD for a HELL of a big increase in price. Click to expand... agreed
As a general rule: With Intel you get a barely noticeable increase in performance from an AMD for a HELL of a big increase in price. Click to expand... agreed
C cell567 In Runtime Messages 318 Mar 27, 2004 #16 exactly...in benchmarks...u wuld find. GOod point BUT in visible performance u wuld not see a diff from like 2800+ against a 2.8 Ghz 800 fsb. thats my 2 cents.
exactly...in benchmarks...u wuld find. GOod point BUT in visible performance u wuld not see a diff from like 2800+ against a 2.8 Ghz 800 fsb. thats my 2 cents.