macdude425
Member (again)
- Messages
- 4,202
Why do you say that?
Raid?
- Thread starter mole1135
- Start date
- Status
midi_junkie
Banned
- Messages
- 38
slower transfer rate than SATA. this is all.
Ste
Do not Stare at my Avatar
- Messages
- 9,578
- Location
- Upon Gleaning Infinity
midi_junkie said:
You have no idea what you talking about..
Now lets think about this Logically, RAID1 "May" be slightly slower, only because it makes a copy of the File onto another HD but, RAID 0 and 5 Are definitly Not slower.
Spliting the data In half (RAID 0) and Splitting the Data into Thirds (RAID 5), Makes transfer, Read and write Alot faster because its doing it in smaller Pieces. If you say a single 7,200 RPM SATA Drive IS faster then then two 7,200 RPM SATA Drives in RAID 0, then your just Wrong.
If your talking about PATA RAID, then Yes it is Slower then SATA RAID, only because its an older Technology...
midi_junkie
Banned
- Messages
- 38
i ahev no idea what im talking about and then you prove me right by saying raid is slower than sata? tf are going on about then?
macdude425
Member (again)
- Messages
- 4,202
Not what he said, midi.
midi_junkie
Banned
- Messages
- 38
"You have no idea what you talking about.." no thats what he said.. i never said anything about dual drives dude wtf?
macdude425
Member (again)
- Messages
- 4,202
Dual drives are the basis of RAID. He was just proving a point.
Ste
Do not Stare at my Avatar
- Messages
- 9,578
- Location
- Upon Gleaning Infinity
Yes, You said
"RAID Sucks"
You said
"Slow Transfer rates then SATA"
You can say RAID Sucks, great sure, thats your opinion, but when you Say "it has slower transfer rates then SATA" there your wrong and I told you that.
You didn't Specifally have to say anything about "Dual Drives" however when you comment on RAID, you should know that any RAID uses more then 1 Drive therefore., you did say something about More then 1 drive, because the only time RAID can be implemented is with 2 or more Drives.
And I have no idea how you got that its Slower, because its actualy not. Prehaps you should do some reasearch before Spouting off on technologies you know very little to nothing about.....
And prehaps you should learn how to read, Because I clearly said the SATA RAID is Faster then a single SATA Drive.... Prehaps not in that direct form, but if you Had Smarts of any kind you could have figured it out...
End.
"RAID Sucks"
You said
"Slow Transfer rates then SATA"
You can say RAID Sucks, great sure, thats your opinion, but when you Say "it has slower transfer rates then SATA" there your wrong and I told you that.
You didn't Specifally have to say anything about "Dual Drives" however when you comment on RAID, you should know that any RAID uses more then 1 Drive therefore., you did say something about More then 1 drive, because the only time RAID can be implemented is with 2 or more Drives.
And I have no idea how you got that its Slower, because its actualy not. Prehaps you should do some reasearch before Spouting off on technologies you know very little to nothing about.....
And prehaps you should learn how to read, Because I clearly said the SATA RAID is Faster then a single SATA Drive.... Prehaps not in that direct form, but if you Had Smarts of any kind you could have figured it out...
End.
midi_junkie
Banned
- Messages
- 38
you can have two sata.. **** you can have 300! wtf are you talking about im saying raid is slower than sata which it is! point proven.
"end."
"end."
macdude425
Member (again)
- Messages
- 4,202
Point proven for Ste. Sorry you won't be able to rebutt, because I'm locking this thread to keep it from turning into a flame war (it's already halfway there).
- Status
Similar threads
