7800GTX 512mb still the best!

[MrZucchiniHead]

I dont Read ****ing anything!

im too lazy to searth around all of the X1900 topics but the 7800GTX 512mb still beats the X1900 series (Both cards)

heres a link for you *******s that dont go to tom's hardware
http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/01/24/ati_radeon_x1900_heats_up_with_48_pixel_pipelines/page8.html

(note: look at the 3Dmark scores and where it should say score it says FPS its kinda funy cause if any card got around 10,000 FPS on 3Dmark05 it would be about about 20 or 30 years from now)

But which card is better for the price? here are the prics for those who dont know

X1900
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...TR12=&ATTR14=&ATTR15=&ATTR16=&ATTR17=&ATTR18=

7800GTX 512mb
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produ...TR12=&ATTR14=&ATTR15=&ATTR16=&ATTR17=&ATTR18=

Give your opinions and facts for the price cause im too lazy to figure it out on my own.

 

[Flanker]

Tom's Hardware can lick my butt.

But its clear from your own link that the X1900 is better than the 7800GTX-512MB...are you looking at the SLI and Crossfire benchmarks?

 

[003]

Please tell me, why you say the 7800GTX512 is still better, when the X1900 beats it in every single test in that review except doom 3 and 3dmark? I don't understand.

 

[MrZucchiniHead]

Ok i give you all the Right to call me a DUMBASS cause i jumped to conclusions when i seen the 3Dmark score.

i never Read anything and if you knew me you would know cause when i have a book report i skim the book.

so please i need you all to call me a Dumbass!

(the 7800GTX 512mb still comes pretty close but it's too expensive)

 

[Powerslave]

Not only that but the prices for the better ati card is still less then the gtx 512.