Geforce 6200 256mb vs 9600XT

[septoid2]

Difference? Is one better then the other? I couldn't find something on the internet showing benchmarks for both cards

 

[Sport1031]

9600XT is faster.

 

[FghtinIrshNvrDi]

9600 any day. The 6200 is a waste of 256MB of ram. The thing just can't use that much ram! Anyway, the 9600XT does outperform. I'd go with it.

Ryan

 

[Riceball]

Yep 9600 is the way to go

 

[PP Mguire]

How the hell would a 3rd gen card like that get outperformed by the 9600XT?? Dudes seriously, 6200 w/ sm3 would pwn that 9600XT.

 

[Powerslave]

3:1 ratio right now, I'd go with 9600 XT

 

[The General]

i'd go with teh 6200 just becausei its not ATI

but i dont see the point in getting either of those if you can get a 6600gt for ~150

 

[Lonewolf5460]

so true but that just may be his best options go with the 9600xt

 

[Powerslave]

i'd go with teh 6200 just becausei its not ATI

but i dont see the point in getting either of those if you can get a 6600gt for ~150

someones just a little bit biased, cough who could it be.

 

[The General]

in my experience ... nvidia support under linux is better.

every ATI card i've had has been less than impressive. including a 9600 pro more than a year ago.