4000+ San Diego vs. X2 3800+ Manchester
- Thread starter j4ckaL
- Start date
- Status
PZEROFGH
Golden Master
- Messages
- 7,689
whenever games start supporting dual core. which i would say next year if FEAR is able to support if fully
it depends if sales of the X2s goes up. and other dual core processors. then the game makers will be like OH everyone is buying a dual core. so we need to make use of it. so they make use of the dual core and everyoen buys the games. and laughs at the people who bought fx series and so on
it depends if sales of the X2s goes up. and other dual core processors. then the game makers will be like OH everyone is buying a dual core. so we need to make use of it. so they make use of the dual core and everyoen buys the games. and laughs at the people who bought fx series and so on
oh yeah, I ment to say 4200+ which is basically the same thing so w/e.
I guess it would be smarter to go with the X2 4200+ then because even if it is slightly less powerful than the 4000+ now it will be better in a year or so if games take advantage of it. BUT what if games don't take advantage of dual core and I wasted my money by not getting the 4000+ which has a larger L2 cache. Man, I don't know which to get now.
I guess it would be smarter to go with the X2 4200+ then because even if it is slightly less powerful than the 4000+ now it will be better in a year or so if games take advantage of it. BUT what if games don't take advantage of dual core and I wasted my money by not getting the 4000+ which has a larger L2 cache. Man, I don't know which to get now.
HAVOC
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 4,217
- Location
- Milford, Connecticut
Benchmark wise? Or just performance wise?
- Status
Similar threads
