AMD Processor vs Intel Processor

[pc_boy]

didn't they have cell processors in very early "super computers?"

 

[Elite Bullet]

ex: AMD Athlon 2.0Ghz 3200+ = Intel 3.2 Ghz

Your obviously talking about 64bit then because my AMD Athlon XP 2800+ is running 2.09GHZ

 

[Apokalipse]

yup, that's why I posted that the Athlon XP 2.2GHZ = Athlon 64 2.0GHZ

 

[waynejkruse10]

If only my ram was better, then i could run my processor @ 400mhz FSB (XP 3200+)

 

[Apokalipse]

does your motherboard support a 400 FSB?

 

[waynejkruse10]

yes

 

[360Man]

Did you know the Athlon 64 revision E supports a 533FSB setting?

Lets hope they activate it as a bios option once ram specs are approved for it.

Right now in the war AMD is winning and Intel is resorting to deactivating SSE through Intel compilers if you dont use a Genuine Intel cpu. That was named in AMD's more recent lawsuit.

 

[pc_boy]

dude, just overclock your ram...

 

[Apokalipse]

Did you know the Athlon 64 revision E supports a 533FSB setting?

Lets hope they activate it as a bios option once ram specs are approved for it.

Right now in the war AMD is winning and Intel is resorting to deactivating SSE through Intel compilers if you dont use a Genuine Intel cpu. That was named in AMD's more recent lawsuit.

Revision E = Venice/San Diego core
and, technically Athlon 64's don't have a FSB, it's HTT.
all of them can reach a DDR533 HTT, but it depends on the CPU, mothreboard and RAM whether it will run stably at that

 

[cthanchan]

pentium 4 3.4EE rocks

cheap

great performanse

energy efficiant

thats what i'm talking about