Nubius
Golden Master
- Messages
- 11,599
Reviewers get CPUs..tinker around with it for a couple hours and call it quits.....you need to look at user reports not reviewers......go to xtremesystems.org and look in the AMD section then in the "Official venice overclocking thread" that will give you a LOT of user reports on how they do....it is true that of course OC'ing is luck of the draw....of course there will be a bad one in every batch but it's been like 95% success with 2.7GHz on air even as almost a standard OC.......winchesters in no way OC better....their silicon architecture simply doesn't allow it, and a tiny bit of research at AMD will confirm this.I read a review in which they couldn't overclock their 3200+ Venice past 2.4ghz and have it run stable. Some say that the Winchesters overclock better than the Venice's despite running a bit warmer.
I'd shoot for lower than 3GHz if I were you, that way if you don't hit it you won't be disappointed.....3GHz is a pretty damn high OC...1GHz over stock without ridiculous insane cooling...that's why I'm going with 2.8GHz, indeed it is still very high OC, but since there's been people hitting that with air and higher I figure it's something decent to shoot for whereas 3GHz, albeit is somewhat common considering the chips is still not just being obtained left and right like welfare checks being passed outwith a few extra tricks im going to throw in. I'll be able to hit 3.0ghz. Then i'll be happy.