Exactly..
"Are you accusing creative of using a 48 kHz h/w sampler or whatever, and artificially up-sampling it to 96 kHz using software?.. "
Granted, 96k is only usefull if you're using a lot of instruments.. Like recording an orchestra. Anyone doing 96k recording should have a better card than the zs2. But the point is that if they false advertise about something like that.. Then what else are they lying about? Is there a reason that the zs2 has noticibly more capcitors and chips on it than ANY other audio card? The 600-700$ cards dont even have half the number of capacitors i see on the zs 2 card. I've been trying to figure out why for some time, but havent been able to find any information regarding it.
"Are you accusing creative of using a 48 kHz h/w sampler or whatever, and artificially up-sampling it to 96 kHz using software?.. "
Granted, 96k is only usefull if you're using a lot of instruments.. Like recording an orchestra. Anyone doing 96k recording should have a better card than the zs2. But the point is that if they false advertise about something like that.. Then what else are they lying about? Is there a reason that the zs2 has noticibly more capcitors and chips on it than ANY other audio card? The 600-700$ cards dont even have half the number of capacitors i see on the zs 2 card. I've been trying to figure out why for some time, but havent been able to find any information regarding it.