Ok,
So i have been reading through these forums and it seems like the majority of people prefer the Venice Core over the San Diego core.
A lot of people say just get the 3200+ and OC it to 4000+ and stuff like that, but wouldn't the San Diego be better, you could just overclock it past 4000+ speeds, right?
Obviously, there is a huge difference in price with the venice at $200 and the san diego at $500. Is that why most of you say the venice is better, because of the price? Lets just say that money was no object, which one is better? San Diego would be better than, right?
Another thing I have been reading is Venice stay cooler and they use less voltage.
So without flaming at each other and all that, in your opinion, why is the venice 3200+ or san diego 4000+ better.
truebe
So i have been reading through these forums and it seems like the majority of people prefer the Venice Core over the San Diego core.
A lot of people say just get the 3200+ and OC it to 4000+ and stuff like that, but wouldn't the San Diego be better, you could just overclock it past 4000+ speeds, right?
Obviously, there is a huge difference in price with the venice at $200 and the san diego at $500. Is that why most of you say the venice is better, because of the price? Lets just say that money was no object, which one is better? San Diego would be better than, right?
Another thing I have been reading is Venice stay cooler and they use less voltage.
So without flaming at each other and all that, in your opinion, why is the venice 3200+ or san diego 4000+ better.
truebe