HAVOC
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 4,217
- Location
- Milford, Connecticut
I was just reading an articles that outlined all of the features of all 3 of these CPU's. It was really interesting to find out that the only major difference between these 3 processors is basically the name and price tag. I kinda wish now that I would have gone with the 4000+ because it would have saved me at least 300+ which I could have used towards something else. Anyway... I don't understand why the price range of the FX-55 & the 4000+ is almost a 300 dollar difference. Other then the name, frequency and max thermal power, they are virtually the same.
Check this out:
FX-55 2.6GHz L1 Cache for all is 128k total
FX-53 2.4GHz L2 Cache for all is 1MB
4000+ 2.4GHz HT is 2000MHz for all
Process for all is 130nm/90nm
Transistor Count is ~105.9 million for all
Die Size is the same 193mm2
Voltage 1.50v for all
FX-55 max thermal power is 104w, FX-53 & 4000+ is 89w
Cost
FX-55 ($815 - $840)
FX-53 ($725 - $740)
4000+ ($545 - $580)
What are everyones thoughts?
Check this out:
FX-55 2.6GHz L1 Cache for all is 128k total
FX-53 2.4GHz L2 Cache for all is 1MB
4000+ 2.4GHz HT is 2000MHz for all
Process for all is 130nm/90nm
Transistor Count is ~105.9 million for all
Die Size is the same 193mm2
Voltage 1.50v for all
FX-55 max thermal power is 104w, FX-53 & 4000+ is 89w
Cost
FX-55 ($815 - $840)
FX-53 ($725 - $740)
4000+ ($545 - $580)
What are everyones thoughts?