The51 said:I beg to differ...
how can you beg to differ when all the benchmarks for gaming show amd ahead? even my proc the amd 3500 beats the 3.77EE in some games.
The51 said:I beg to differ...
lol I hate rice burners even more, but I've grown up with my dad being a chevy person my whole life so that's all I'm accustomed toWhat? Nubioso, ju haf challenged my honor. I haf no recourse but to challenge ju to a duel... pistols hat dawn, ju scoundrel.
Ha. It doesn't bother me. Just keep your rice-burner out from in front of my Expedition...
Yeah that's what I said in a previous post. Atleast they are getting to the point of making each clock cycle count instead of just raising to higher and higher clock speeds with little effect.It's still pretty impressive though, considering the Intel is only running at 2.8GHz (which is relatively low considering what's out now) and it's competing with a 3500+, I'd say Intel is doing something right.
Not only is it two cores vs one, but it has a hell of a lot more L2 cache and going against a mid-ranged AMD64, it's not even a contest. I'd call it more propaganda to make the Intel look better.That being said, it does use two cores therefore it's not really an accurate comparison and there won't really be one until we see the Toledo released, and then these things will be dated and it'll still be kinda unfair.
Well if they take the awesome single threaded power of an AMD, and they keep that power, and put it into the AMD Dual cores we're looking at one helluva chip no doubt, which you can sign me up for any dayI'm still not decided if dual cores are for me or not though, I think I'd rather have a powerful single threaded for cheap than some expensive multithreaded one though
The all new Intamd haVoc2k5 4GHz CPU....featuring quad nubioso coresI really wish a TOP Engineer from AMD & a TOP Engineer from Intel could steal design plans from both of the companies and merge them into a new, SUPER CPU. It would have to be the best for gaming and heavy multitask friendly. Kinda like the P4 3.73 EE meets the AMD FX-55. They could call it the "haVoc2k5" it would be quad core and run at 4.0Ghz. It would also cost $2,500.00 and you would need to cool it with the surface of Pluto. Wishful thinking!!!
Nubius said:it DIDNT beat out a FX-55 dude. Read the damn article, it's against an AMD64 3500+ which is what....2.2GHz?