pc_boy said:....so I win!
...your ignorance dooms you to failure. i did not say "ya, you think your computer is good cuz you don't do $h!# with it"...you did. stop making things up in your mind and get with the program. There are far more CPU intensive apps than imaging photo/video's, you just don't know how to use them and don't need them (i bet NO ONE here would run these kinds of programs) Programs that require multiple buildings of PC power and years of # crunching. these kinds of programs put photo/video imaging to shame.
You compared your PC to a 2.8GHz P4??? what kind of comparison is that? that's nothing! with a standard overclock my slapped together rig will beat a 3.4GHz Intel in benchmarking...2.8GHz is nothing. Try comparing your system to a 5.4GHz Intel (overclocked of course) or something up there...and it loses, by many miles.
pc_boy said:the ATHLON 64 IS ONLY 2.6GHZ, for you people who are P4 fanz*
* like that one kid who bladdered about my PC being far from a 2.5GHZ P4 even overclocked to 3200+
you obviously don't understand the efficiency ratings of AMD vs. Intel. GHz aren't everything. To say "my 2.6GHz AMD beats your 3.4GHz Intel...HAHA!" is stupid. they are on entirely different levels, one is 64-bit and one is not, the AMD64 cannot be compared to an Intel based on GHz alone.
again you are making things up...i never said your computer would lose compared to a "#Ghz P4 system." You read what i said and just decided to twist my actual text. it would help if you QUOTED people instead of typing up your own false version of what was really typed.