Should a person go xp athlon or is 64 necessary?

Status
Not open for further replies.
If you are going to go with the higher end Sempron, then I would look at the A64 b/c the price difference wont be much more. If you go with something alittle cheaper, like the 2500+ Barton $86, emtioned above then you should not consider dishing out the extra dough for the 64 b/c what you will be doing wont need a powerhouse cpu.
 
very few stores still stock the xp2500 retail and if you find some the prices are crazy. a better cpu would be the xp2500 mobile. if you insist on retail try this

19-103-342-04.JPG


http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProductDesc.asp?description=19-103-342&depa=1

AMD Athlon XP 2700+, 333MHz FSB, 256K Cache Processor - Retail $104.00


Model# AXDA2700BOX
Item # N82E16819103342
Specifications:
Model: AMD Athlon XP 2700+
Core: Thoroughbred
Operating Frequency: 2.17GHz
FSB: 333MHz
Cache: L1/64K+64K; L2/256K
Voltage: 1.65V
Process: 0.13Micron
Socket: Socket A
Multimedia Instruction: MMX, SSE, 3DNOW!, 3DNOW!+
Packaging: Retail Box (Heatsink and Fan included)
 
gaara said:
I really don't know where people are getting this idea that just because a 64 bit proccesor, it only excels in 64 bit applications. This is totally untrue. The Athlon 64s are some of the fastest 32 bit proccesors availible on the market today. The benchmarks speak for themselves, and guess what, the benchmarks are performed in 32 bit applications.

benchmarks are the only place appart from high end games that you really notice a difference, and even then, the difference is not much between a Sempron, Athlon XP and Athlon 64 2800+
yes the Athlon 64's are some of the fastest 32-bit CPU's, but for this purpose (word, internet and whatnot) the difference is unnoticable
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom