Totally missed the point I was making towards Steve. The game has that much usage, but when overclocked it gives no performance benefits. Means the game really isn't CPU bound at all, although the game itself is resource inflated from Ubisoft so not really the best description.
LOL.... Please shut up already I had enough of beating around the bush with you today. :|
My biggest deal here is the guy has a 75 dollar chip that can perform like a 300 dollar one and anybody screaming AMD shouldn't be. Why make him buy into a dead platform? The 8350 is slower than his upgrade options for socket 1150 already, and while overclocked can perform better than the 8350 he can't afford anyways. That's been my deal this whole time. This whole thread was junked due to a stupid AMD vs Intel war for no reason. The absolute best option for him and his budget was what I specified.
Get your facts right again before going off the deep end.
#1 please state to all members here how this turn into a amd vs intel war ?
No one here even started that, everyone gave an opinion we're all good for it.
#2 Please explain to me personally how a amd 8350 cam einto the picture ? o0
I linked a amd hexacore and its quite good and affordable I don't know how in the hell you got all that mixed up.
#3. Go read dauntes last post about amd and intel, he said both are good but intel has a good uprade path for now.
That maybe true but amd am3+ could hold anyone to the floor if their needs are being met and they're willing to give it a try.
I had my chip for almost 3 years and I don't have the need to upgrade for what it does.
Though I do plan on selling it in september and get a hexacore so I can fold this winter and work/game like a maniac too.
After this I don't care what happens next, glad mud got his system.
Last edited: