Ah okay, i ws going to go with fx 6100 but heard it is no good so went big and thought the i7 3770k would be awesome but worried about bottlenecking with thw 7770. I m fairly new to the whole computers really D:
Ah okay, i ws going to go with fx 6100 but heard it is no good so went big and thought the i7 3770k would be awesome but worried about bottlenecking with thw 7770. I m fairly new to the whole computers really D:
Neither the FX6100 or 3770k will bottleneck the 7770, but the 3770k will be much faster. What do you intend on doing with your PC all around? If it is just gaming you would be fine with the 3570k to save a bit of money unless budget isn't a problem.
Neither the FX6100 or 3770k will bottleneck the 7770, but the 3770k will be much faster. What do you intend on doing with your PC all around? If it is just gaming you would be fine with the 3570k to save a bit of money unless budget isn't a problem.
The benefits of having a 3770k over a 3570k for gaming are severely outweighed by the extra cost. The 3570k and 2500k are pretty much perfect for games as no more than 4 cores are used. Having HT just generates extra unnecessary heat.
The benefits of having a 3770k over a 3570k for gaming are severely outweighed by the extra cost. The 3570k and 2500k are pretty much perfect for games as no more than 4 cores are used. Having HT just generates extra unnecessary heat.
All 3 CPUs mentioned would play BF3 smooth, but the 7770 wont play it smooth on high settings unless you have a lower resolution monitor. The 3570k is the better of the 2 CPUs.
To give you an idea of performance here is a chart.
According to this, at 1920x1200 with 4xAA the 7770 is slightly slower than a 465 which is what I currently have. My card is OCed to about 480 speeds and at 1920x1080 I play medium to high settings with 2xAA and High post AA. I average about 40fps with this card and a 2500k. With the 7770 you will probably average a bit less depending on settings and resolution.