ChaosBlizzard
Banned
- Messages
- 559
4W4K3 said:Know a guy named Caleb? he goes to Devry in Texas. 2000 is indeed old and Microsoft will stop updating it in a few months, get ready for system holes and no patches my friend. 2000 has many bugs that will go unfixed...XP has problems yes, but it is fully supported and updated constintely. I would prefer an updated OS over one that will be left to the dogs. Might i add you said you do not overclock, of course you do not crash. I overclock the snot out of my machine and reboots are expected. The main issue will be viruses/hacking..i have been on my home network for i think 7 yrs. now and never once been "attacked", that's all i care about since i kow my system is going to crash while i test it's overclocking ability. i guarantee you your 2000 based machine will crash if you set it at 200*10 trying to overclock it. and if i try 300*10 mine will crash...OS has nothing to do with overclocking/hardware overclocking.
You do know SP5 is in the works for Windows 2000? No they will NOT drop it from support. How many companies do you know that will switch from a business OS to a Home OS??!?!
Windows 2000 is a corporate operating system, Windows XP is NOT!
So you just stated that the OS has nothing to do with overclockability. Yet you say if I have Windows 2000 it won't be able to overclock as well?
What your telling me is.. Windows XP is more secure than Windows 2000? Right, Win2k only has SP4 out.. What is XP up to? OH yeah problematic SP2.
So now you state that you overclock? Hmm, I wonder why you out did my system on arithmetic?
I fix PC's all the time.. Windows Xp has more problems that you would like to believe. How many times does your Windows XP system crash? I will tell you mine DOESN'T.
BTW- My major is Computer Network System's. I have already done CISCO training..