building my first amd/ati setup

Status
Not open for further replies.

SirCyber

Daemon Poster
Messages
1,114
Location
In a yellow Submarine
so I have an xClio Windtunnel sitting in my garage with an EVGA 680i mobo and a 600W psu in it. have a 1T HDD and an EVGA 9600GT sitting aside. but considering the age of the mobo I figured I'd use the case, psu, and HDD and just start fresh with the rest. here's what I came up with, it's a lite gamer, mostly web browsing *it's for my wife*
Newegg.com - AMD FX-4100 Zambezi 3.6GHz (3.8GHz Turbo) Socket AM3+ 95W Quad-Core Desktop Processor FD4100WMGUSBX
Newegg.com - GIGABYTE GA-990FXA-UD3 AM3+ AMD 990FX SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard
Newegg.com - Crucial Ballistix 4GB 240-Pin DDR3 SDRAM DDR3 2000 (PC3 16000) Desktop Memory Model BLE4G3D2001CE1TX0
Newegg.com - XFX Double D HD-679X-ZDFC Radeon HD 6790 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video Card

and if the psu I have doesn't work for the card/board

Newegg.com - PC Power and Cooling Silencer Mk II 750W High Performance 80PLUS Silver SLI CrossFire ready Power Supply

now this is mostly selected on linking amd products as best as I can. the RAM is the lowest latency that I could find, the board by a company I know, in the price I like. the card much the same. so I guess this is a call out to the AMD specialists... what are your thoughts?
 
all the stuff will work but for light gaming ram seems alittle overkill and id look for a cheaper board and get a better gpu and go after a phenom over the 4100 like these items

Newegg.com - GIGABYTE GA-990XA-UD3 AM3+ AMD 990X SATA 6Gb/s USB 3.0 ATX AMD Motherboard

Newegg.com - XFX HD-685X-ZCFC Radeon HD 6850 1GB 256-bit GDDR5 PCI Express 2.1 x16 HDCP Ready CrossFireX Support Video Card

Newegg.com - AMD Phenom II X4 960T Zosma 3.0GHz Socket AM3 95W Quad-Core Desktop Processor HD96ZTWFGRBOX

very little more money and much better gaming

PS 600w should be fine
 
ok, thanks for the reply... now I have questions. the card... the only thing that pops to me is the streaming processors. the Double D beats the 6850 on core and memory clock. how much perf difference is there when losing the battle on those but winning on streaming processors?
Combine an AMD FX CPU with an AMD 9-series chipset motherboard and AMD Radeon HD 6000 series graphics cards to create the AMD “Scorpius” platform.
Does this do anything for performance? that quote is from newegg from the XF series chip, which is what I meant about the linking. also, the 4GB of ram also takes into account music editing and possible graphics editing. I think it's worth the expense for the increased performance. games will include DDO and possibly other modern games, but the amount of play will be light
 
don't want to come off argumentative, just trying to clear things up. the 6770 is also 256 bit, unless I'm missing something? I've now done alot of reading into the 6770 and 6850, I understand that the 6850 is better, I just can't grasp why. according to specs it should not be faster/better.
 
very simplistic explanation of what they are and do but think of the stream processors as cpu cores. if you look at the higher end cards there core/mem clocks realy are not that more if at all from the 6790 but there stream processors are alot more.


PS: i mean simplistic as to what they technically are and do

Edit.... im so sorry:cute: its the 6790 your talking about and indeed it is 256bit
 
LOL makes two of us not catching that, I just went with the 6770... so ok, the 6790 only trails the 6850 on streaming processors... core and mem clock higher, everything else appears identical. is there that much actual performance difference?
 
why would you order 1 4gb stick of ddr3 2000 ram instead of 2 4gb sticks of ddr3 1600 ram for the same price?
 
then I highly suggest you read up on DDR3 speed scaling.
for your purposes (light gaming and web browsing), faster ram makes no difference.
8 GB of RAM with a RAM disk on the other hand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom