Graphics Performance List

[redfish]

Howsabout the lower-end GT's? e.g. GT 240, GT 430, GT 210, etc.

 

[Abstract Hero]

Sorry I meant 38, 39 but yeah sounds right.

Still need a new card.

 

[S0ULphIRE]

GT240(41) 6870(6) 6850(10) added.

And is it just me, or should the 4670 technically be below the 3850? And the 8800GTS for that matter?

 

[Trotter]

The 4670 should be equal to a 3770 (if there had been one). Of course, sometimes the silicon makes bigger/smaller jumps than what we think it should.

 

[acerinpa]

Glad I looked at the list today - I figured the 6850 would be higher and I was wondering why it is for sale cheaper than the 5850. Weird that the newer card is less expensive and has less performance.

 

[Yami]

It's weird because they're moving the numbers up a notch, i.e. a 5770 is numerically equal to a 6870. They've just increased all the category numbers by a hundred

 

[Apokalipse]

Don't know why they didn't just name the 6990 into the 6890 instead, with 6870 and 6850 being single GPU Cayman cards, and 6770 and 6750 being Barts cards

Anyway, the 6970 and 6950 are kinda difficult to place yet - with Catalyst 10.12 being just released promising significant gains, and reviewers still mostly using 10.11 or a 10.10 hotfix driver

 

[krappo]

Its great to know these things, Many Thanks

 

[Abstract Hero]

GTS 450 between GTX260 and 5770? or just below 260?

 

[S0ULphIRE]

I'm gonna say below the 260, but that's only from looking at one review so far.