While in theory it sounds good, the fact is that he has much different standards than us. Folding on a single home machine is not that difficult to setup. For him he flat out said that he had 16 Quad CPU's to manage. So yeah maybe WGC is much easier to manage for him. But honestly, F@H is not that difficult to setup.
Install, click the executable file and put in name and team. Not really that hard for a home user to do. As Folding has measures in place to make sure that it is not installed on machines that a person does not own or have rights to run it on.
http://www.techist.com/forums/f109/back-folding-216045/#post1713899
As relevant by that post and on the topic of conversation. But frankly this doesnt answer any questions i brought up.
How is this different than F@H?
Is it better for a Intel or AMD? Since Intel has the Math processor and from what i read, this is about crunching numbers which AMD does not do as well. So in theory this would be worse to do on a AMD system.
Yeah i know about BIONIC, and honestly i dont find it any better than F@H. For F@H all we know is that we fold proteins, we do not know what these proteins are for and we do not know what they are used for. So while WGC claims that you can help cure AIDS, the same can be said from F@H cause there is no set answer for what folding the proteins do. We just know they go to curing disease or cancer or whatever. So we can say that we are helping just as much as using the BIONIC Client.
I will try it out for a bit. Just to see if i can spot the difference and answer these questions myself.
Install, click the executable file and put in name and team. Not really that hard for a home user to do. As Folding has measures in place to make sure that it is not installed on machines that a person does not own or have rights to run it on.
http://www.techist.com/forums/f109/back-folding-216045/#post1713899
As relevant by that post and on the topic of conversation. But frankly this doesnt answer any questions i brought up.
How is this different than F@H?
Is it better for a Intel or AMD? Since Intel has the Math processor and from what i read, this is about crunching numbers which AMD does not do as well. So in theory this would be worse to do on a AMD system.
Yeah i know about BIONIC, and honestly i dont find it any better than F@H. For F@H all we know is that we fold proteins, we do not know what these proteins are for and we do not know what they are used for. So while WGC claims that you can help cure AIDS, the same can be said from F@H cause there is no set answer for what folding the proteins do. We just know they go to curing disease or cancer or whatever. So we can say that we are helping just as much as using the BIONIC Client.
I will try it out for a bit. Just to see if i can spot the difference and answer these questions myself.