Druid Fully Optimized Messages 3,065 Mar 26, 2009 #11 Cause the gram isn't additive? That little bit more the 85 has makes that big a difference?
Poizen22 Camera junky Messages 6,283 Location ottawa ontario canada. Mar 26, 2009 #12 philbar71 said: ^ the tri sli'ed GTX 285's outperform 2 GTX 295's at the res he is at. Click to expand... tri 285's beat the 295 at every resolution.
philbar71 said: ^ the tri sli'ed GTX 285's outperform 2 GTX 295's at the res he is at. Click to expand... tri 285's beat the 295 at every resolution.
Druid Fully Optimized Messages 3,065 Mar 26, 2009 #13 cause of the GRAM? How much does it win by? It can't be that much.
Poizen22 Camera junky Messages 6,283 Location ottawa ontario canada. Mar 26, 2009 #14 Druid said: cause of the GRAM? How much does it win by? It can't be that much. Click to expand... no gram has nothign to do with it the preformence diferene is quite substancial tbh. but quad sli seems more practical then try sli.
Druid said: cause of the GRAM? How much does it win by? It can't be that much. Click to expand... no gram has nothign to do with it the preformence diferene is quite substancial tbh. but quad sli seems more practical then try sli.
Druid Fully Optimized Messages 3,065 Mar 26, 2009 #15 Why them can tri-sli beat quad sli? I mean, is the gtx 285 that much better than a gtx260/280 fusion?
Why them can tri-sli beat quad sli? I mean, is the gtx 285 that much better than a gtx260/280 fusion?