My New i7 Build (56k lulz)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Why would you put 1000GB of data in Raid 0?
100% higher chance of loosing everything.
 
Why would you put 1000GB of data in Raid 0?
100% higher chance of loosing everything.

cause i can... ??

plus it would be 2000gb if data at that point with massive speed.

Is their certain system build ethic guidline im not aware of on this site in a sticky somewhere i should read?
 
cause i can... ??

plus it would be 2000gb if data at that point with massive speed.

Is their certain system build ethic guidline im not aware of on this site in a sticky somewhere i should read?

Raid 0:
Fault Tolerance: None. Failure of any drive results in loss of all data.

Its smart to put two 250GB HDD's together in Raid 0 for your OS and have as much as you want additional.
 
I wouldn't personally RAID 0 1TB drives but do what you want. I guess just make sure you backup your data.

Oh and stop double posting. Edit your posts if you have something else to say before somebody replies. This isn't AIM. It helps to keep things organized and clear.
 
are you sure...

do your homework brother:rolleyes:

Yeah i misread your earlier post. Sorry.

But yes, its not worth doing it with TB drives.
PS: Anything wrong with that case? Or would you recommend it?
Looks like its solid.
 
Raid 0:
Fault Tolerance: None. Failure of any drive results in loss of all data.

Its smart to put two 250GB HDD's together in Raid 0 for your OS and have as much as you want additional.

I understand maybe you can tell me why thay call it RAID when there isnt any redundency at all?

I could do 4 1tb's with groups in raid 1 and the final 2 arrays in raid 0

speed and redundency... eh?
 
I understand maybe you can tell me why thay call it RAID when there isnt any redundency at all?

I could do 4 1tb's with groups in raid 1 and the final 2 arrays in raid 0

speed and redundency... eh?

That just sounds like a waste of money lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom