M maroon1 Banned Messages 3,479 Jan 23, 2009 #51 philbar71 said: basically this is like 2 celeron dual core slaped on a single chip. . Click to expand... Q7500 has 2MB cache (1MB for each dual core) While celeron dual core has 512MB cache So, it is not like 2 celeron dual core
philbar71 said: basically this is like 2 celeron dual core slaped on a single chip. . Click to expand... Q7500 has 2MB cache (1MB for each dual core) While celeron dual core has 512MB cache So, it is not like 2 celeron dual core
Hussein19891 Biostar Stole my heart Messages 2,210 Location Canada Jan 23, 2009 #52 Sounds like the E5200 really. If it can overclock anything like the E5200, then it should do very well.
Sounds like the E5200 really. If it can overclock anything like the E5200, then it should do very well.
gurusan Golden Master Messages 6,562 Location Portland, OR Jan 23, 2009 #53 I hope this can do super mega awesome clocks
NosBoost300 I poop on the rug Messages 10,220 Location Bellflower, CA Jan 23, 2009 #54 Ethan_Kaizer said: Exactly. And with the fact that the i7 920 is in the same range as the PII 940, I think it would keep Intel ahead. Click to expand... wait what is this statement blabbering about?
Ethan_Kaizer said: Exactly. And with the fact that the i7 920 is in the same range as the PII 940, I think it would keep Intel ahead. Click to expand... wait what is this statement blabbering about?
gurusan Golden Master Messages 6,562 Location Portland, OR Jan 23, 2009 #55 guys cache isn't that big of a deal. it helps by a substantial amount but just look at the E1200, it performs well when clocked and has only 512kb cache per core. If this quad can do 3.5-4ghz then it's awesome value.
guys cache isn't that big of a deal. it helps by a substantial amount but just look at the E1200, it performs well when clocked and has only 512kb cache per core. If this quad can do 3.5-4ghz then it's awesome value.