U U-Toast Fully Optimized Messages 1,626 Sep 5, 2004 #1 Ok, what would u guys recommend disregarding the price difference. Which would performe better? What different with the 939 pin over the 754? Thanks
Ok, what would u guys recommend disregarding the price difference. Which would performe better? What different with the 939 pin over the 754? Thanks
TheMajor PowerQuest / Opera Messages 10,176 Location Netherlands Sep 5, 2004 #2 I would say 3400 is better.
OP OP U U-Toast Fully Optimized Messages 1,626 Sep 5, 2004 #3 but the 3500 is newcastle, 512 l2 cache, but what are the big differences with the 2? 939 pin and 754
but the 3500 is newcastle, 512 l2 cache, but what are the big differences with the 2? 939 pin and 754
TheMajor PowerQuest / Opera Messages 10,176 Location Netherlands Sep 5, 2004 #4 939 are more pins..LOL
TheMajor PowerQuest / Opera Messages 10,176 Location Netherlands Sep 5, 2004 #5 the more cache the better!!!!
OP OP U U-Toast Fully Optimized Messages 1,626 Sep 5, 2004 #6 duh, but ur still not helping, what does it change in performance? What can i expect out of both cpus. how much of a performace increase will i get woth 3500+? is it owrth the extra 100$?
duh, but ur still not helping, what does it change in performance? What can i expect out of both cpus. how much of a performace increase will i get woth 3500+? is it owrth the extra 100$?
OP OP U U-Toast Fully Optimized Messages 1,626 Sep 5, 2004 #7 ok u just said more cache better, the clawhammer has more cash than the 939 3500....
TheMajor PowerQuest / Opera Messages 10,176 Location Netherlands Sep 5, 2004 #8 mmm, i'm not sure about it..let me think
TheMajor PowerQuest / Opera Messages 10,176 Location Netherlands Sep 5, 2004 #10 ok..I would get the 3400+ because it has 1MB chache and runs also at 2.2GHz like the 3500 and i would OC it
ok..I would get the 3400+ because it has 1MB chache and runs also at 2.2GHz like the 3500 and i would OC it