ok so the 4870 offers 800 Stream Processors
and the gtx 280 offers 240 Stream Processors
i believe its true that nvidia's Stream Processors are running faster than ati's
so why doesnt ati increase the speed on theirs since they seem to be able to fit 3x+ more of them on the card.
could nvidia fit more of these on their cards?
or is ati just using lesser quality Stream Processors than nvidia.
what i would love to see in the next generation of vid cards from nvidia is
gddr5 / 500+ Stream Processors / 1000+ core clock / 512-bit or higher Memory Interface (allready achieved) /
what i would love to see in the next generation of vid cards from ati is
gddr5 (allready achieved) / higher clocked stream processors / 1000+ core clock / 512-bit or higher memory interface
these specs are for single gpu cards.
it seems as tho nvidia and ati has each to its own, strengths and weaknesses.
your thoughts.
and the gtx 280 offers 240 Stream Processors
i believe its true that nvidia's Stream Processors are running faster than ati's
so why doesnt ati increase the speed on theirs since they seem to be able to fit 3x+ more of them on the card.
could nvidia fit more of these on their cards?
or is ati just using lesser quality Stream Processors than nvidia.
what i would love to see in the next generation of vid cards from nvidia is
gddr5 / 500+ Stream Processors / 1000+ core clock / 512-bit or higher Memory Interface (allready achieved) /
what i would love to see in the next generation of vid cards from ati is
gddr5 (allready achieved) / higher clocked stream processors / 1000+ core clock / 512-bit or higher memory interface
these specs are for single gpu cards.
it seems as tho nvidia and ati has each to its own, strengths and weaknesses.
your thoughts.