C CalcProgrammer1 Fully Optimized Messages 2,363 Location Illinois, USA Nov 17, 2008 #51 Just to show that it was running F@H for the picture, I don't usually run it (it doesn't even work right in Windows 7).
Just to show that it was running F@H for the picture, I don't usually run it (it doesn't even work right in Windows 7).
Luke Golden Master Messages 5,605 Location Vancouver, Canada Nov 17, 2008 #52 Samsung 226bw 22" 1680x1050 2ms. Before they supposedly starting making crap versions of it (if thats true even) 17" acer 5ms 1280x1024 (but for the last few weeks i have had it on my secondary computer instead of my main.
Samsung 226bw 22" 1680x1050 2ms. Before they supposedly starting making crap versions of it (if thats true even) 17" acer 5ms 1280x1024 (but for the last few weeks i have had it on my secondary computer instead of my main.
ricanflow Golden Master Messages 6,317 Location Euless, Tx Nov 17, 2008 #53 CalcProgrammer1 said: Just to show that it was running F@H for the picture, I don't usually run it (it doesn't even work right in Windows 7). Click to expand... Ahh good....yeah it looks nice but doesnt even work all the time.
CalcProgrammer1 said: Just to show that it was running F@H for the picture, I don't usually run it (it doesn't even work right in Windows 7). Click to expand... Ahh good....yeah it looks nice but doesnt even work all the time.