*The Official Tech-Forums 3DMark06/03 Rankings*

[thirdshiftdj]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

I ran 4.2 for the bench that got 21.5, but I didn't really push it any. I'm sure I can get this thing to 4.5 easy. Right now I'm just running it stock until I find some more time to play around. I also need to find some good RAM. This stuff is okay if I only want to run 2gb, but if I put 4 in then I limit my OC.

I sold my 4x1gb to pick up some 2x2gb dominators. I knew once I had a quad that this stuff had to go even though I didn't want it to.


@AMDGT it shows you at 3.8ghz right now not 3.6. Even if you get to 4ghz its not gonna merit 1000points

 

[Poizen22]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

if he gets about 4.5 which he should as that chip is an e8500 with less cache, he will get the score he deserves.

 

[Shumway]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

Man this really sucks

Ran 3Dmark a couple times last night and the best i could manage with my pentium d & 9800gt was 7507

 

[thirdshiftdj]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

its your processor don't be discouraged

 

[Shumway]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

I know its the cpu holding me back

First score at stock 2.8ghz was only 6200

 

[ricanflow]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

3dmark isnt a big deal anyways.

Game performance will still be there.

 

[Gabb]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

anyone notice how its kind of odd theres no scores posted between 11,100-14,000?

 

[Puddle Jumper]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

^^Somehow they got deleted.

 

[veedubfreak]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

Anything under 20k is useless anyway

 

[NosBoost300]

Re: The Tech Forums Official 3DMark06/03 Top List

Anything under 20k is useless anyway

amen