J Jtumble2 In Runtime Messages 202 Sep 13, 2008 #1 I was looking into raid 0 with two Western digital 250gig sata 3.0 with the 16mb cache. It's only got a 4 star rating with 130 reviews. So should I go with dual 80gb WD 8mb cache drives? How bad will the less cache hurt performance? Thanks
I was looking into raid 0 with two Western digital 250gig sata 3.0 with the 16mb cache. It's only got a 4 star rating with 130 reviews. So should I go with dual 80gb WD 8mb cache drives? How bad will the less cache hurt performance? Thanks
V Ventriac In Runtime Messages 443 Location Maine Sep 13, 2008 #2 Reviews don't mean anything really, just a bunch of retards who presume to know what they're doing are given a voice to try and critique items that aren't to their perfection. Get the WD 320gb SE16, those are fast/ncie/quiet/cool hd's.
Reviews don't mean anything really, just a bunch of retards who presume to know what they're doing are given a voice to try and critique items that aren't to their perfection. Get the WD 320gb SE16, those are fast/ncie/quiet/cool hd's.
OP OP J Jtumble2 In Runtime Messages 202 Sep 13, 2008 #3 Wow, I didnt even see that drive. Really nice drive. I'll probably go for that when I do buy. Thanks
baron5 Fully Optimized Messages 2,984 Location Australia Sep 14, 2008 #4 i second that, i have one and its just as good as my old seagate 320gb 16mb, except it gets 5.9 in vista data transfer instead of 5.7
i second that, i have one and its just as good as my old seagate 320gb 16mb, except it gets 5.9 in vista data transfer instead of 5.7
