Redmo0n Techalicious Messages 1,566 Location Perth, Australia Sep 11, 2008 #1 Anyone herd of these? Any pros/cons? Could be a good recommendation over the q6600.
veedubfreak Golden Master Messages 6,979 Sep 11, 2008 #2 Pros - its a quad core Cons - its more expensive than a q6600, is slower and has less cache. its a useless chip, not even sure why intel made it. Just buy a q6600 if you want a cheap quad.
Pros - its a quad core Cons - its more expensive than a q6600, is slower and has less cache. its a useless chip, not even sure why intel made it. Just buy a q6600 if you want a cheap quad.
Baez Admin / Dev Staff member Messages 6,990 Location Toronto, Canada Sep 12, 2008 #3 It's also a 45nm process die instead of the Q6600's 65nm. I guess Intel figured that would be its sell point. Stick with the Q6600.
It's also a 45nm process die instead of the Q6600's 65nm. I guess Intel figured that would be its sell point. Stick with the Q6600.
veedubfreak Golden Master Messages 6,979 Sep 12, 2008 #4 I'm pretty sure its a salvage part from the 9450/9550/9650 etc.