zedman3d
Fully Optimized
- Messages
- 2,850
console graphics are poo
Theyre not that bad, but yeah, PC's own.
console graphics are poo
That's true but console games graphics are generally not as good as pc games. Plus you can use a powerful pc for allot more than gaming.
Is it required to have quad core for new games. And will they ever require it?
Cause I wanted to get Q6600 but i hear E8400 can Overclock alot better and easier.
Also right now Q6600 are bad.
Whats your suggestion (Not interested at all in Nahalem)
Personally I suggest E8400
Because cheaper, runs cooler and faster in current games
At the time games use 4 cores, you would buy a new CPU
okay...
1) crysis sucks
2) guru, stop bragging about you proliferation of quad ownership
3) whoever said that you should buy a current quad for future requirements is insane. that makes no sense.
okay...
1) crysis sucks
2) guru, stop bragging about you proliferation of quad ownership
3) whoever said that you should buy a current quad for future requirements is insane. that makes no sense.
1. Crysis owns
2. dually noted
3. Were you in the same crowd that was initially opposed to dual cores because a higher clocked single core got 3 more fps in games? Some new games are multi-threaded and recommend a dual core, you don't think in the future they will recommend quads?