Graphics card Rankings

[gurusan]

you are right. The 9600GT is neck and neck with the 3870

 

[veg1992]

That was supposed to be the 768mb, thats why there are two 9600gso's 384mb's on that list.. nice catch thanks

 

[gurusan]

the 9600gt is still faster than the 9600gso 768.....

 

[veg1992]

www.LLY.get.to: GeForce 9600GSO vs 9600GT

I saw that... and most some people at Toms Hardware said they are believable so idk..

GTX 280
9800GX2
HD4870
8800Ultra
GTX 260
HD4850
HD3870X2
9800GTX
8800GTX
8800GTS 512MB (G92 Revision)
8800GT 512MB
HD3870 512MB
9600GT
HD2900XT 1GB
HD2900Pro 1GB
HD2900XT 512MB
HD2900Pro 512MB
8800GTS 640MB
HD3850 512MB
8800GT 256MB
9600GSO 384MB
8800GS 384MB
HD3850 256MB

So I don't know where to put the 768mb 9600GSO

 

[Peter.Cort]

just leave it out. nobody really likes it anyway

and how does the 9600gt beat out a 2900xt 1gb.......................wtf?

 

[gurusan]

ok well if that's legit then I stand corrected.

Also one other thing I just remembered is that there's a certain kind of Galaxy 9600GSO 384mb that you can actually flash to a G92 8800GTS 512mb!

 

[Drizzt]

LOL wat?!

Meaning it performs like one? I dont think so :/

 

[gurusan]

no, meaning you actually unlock the extra shaders and memory

 

[maroon1]

That's a very general statement.

No, not really. It is not a general statement

I meant that the Nvidia is better in DX10 mode in BioShock. Thats why I posted the benchmark for BioShock in DX10.

 

[Peter.Cort]

No, not really. It is not a general statement

I meant that the Nvidia is better in DX10 mode in BioShock. Thats why I posted the benchmark for BioShock in DX10.

ok dude. first off, why waste our time to respond to something that was said 10 days ago..... secondly i can see what you are saying with your statement, and it does make sense to me as the last thing posted was in response to the graph so that makes sense. but also that takes into account all the new cards for nvidia, but only the 4850 for ATI. (correct me if i'm wrong) but that didn't show the 4870 or the 3870x2. and that's 2 of ATI's heavy hitters that aren't showing up on that graph. also there are a few discrepancies between the two graphs. the 8800gt actually gains fps as do a couple others, while some loose tons. are the test rigs the same?