OP OP A azzyork In Runtime Messages 174 Location long beach, ca May 15, 2008 #11 read the conclusion to this page OCZ Vendetta 2 Review » Page 5 - Conclusion - Overclockers Club
OP OP A azzyork In Runtime Messages 174 Location long beach, ca May 15, 2008 #13 if u guys think about it its a bang for ur buck 40 dollars and its beating names such and thermalright wow!!!
if u guys think about it its a bang for ur buck 40 dollars and its beating names such and thermalright wow!!!
aspire The Water Cooling Guru Messages 5,308 Location United States May 15, 2008 #14 azzyork said: read the conclusion to this page OCZ Vendetta 2 Review » Page 5 - Conclusion - Overclockers Club Click to expand... I fail to see your point there. It says it includes its own thermal paste, but they never say thats what they used... harnar123 said: fail. Click to expand... Did you even read the review?...
azzyork said: read the conclusion to this page OCZ Vendetta 2 Review » Page 5 - Conclusion - Overclockers Club Click to expand... I fail to see your point there. It says it includes its own thermal paste, but they never say thats what they used... harnar123 said: fail. Click to expand... Did you even read the review?...
peterhuang913 Retired. Messages 8,076 Location . May 15, 2008 #15 azzyork said: if u guys think about it its a bang for ur buck 40 dollars and its beating names such and thermalright wow!!! Click to expand... dude, how does it beat names like TR?
azzyork said: if u guys think about it its a bang for ur buck 40 dollars and its beating names such and thermalright wow!!! Click to expand... dude, how does it beat names like TR?
OP OP A azzyork In Runtime Messages 174 Location long beach, ca May 16, 2008 #16 this item is new.... how about this review OCZ Vendetta 2 CPU Cooler Reviews - OCIA.net
Wildside Hellfire! Messages 3,038 Location Riverside, CA May 16, 2008 #17 i like the Tuniq, it's just huge!
D dario03 Fully Optimized Messages 2,078 May 16, 2008 #18 I wouldn't spend $13 more dollars based on a test showing 0.75c difference. I didn't know the Xigmatek was only $37. Maybe I should get one.... My room does get really hot in the summer time.
I wouldn't spend $13 more dollars based on a test showing 0.75c difference. I didn't know the Xigmatek was only $37. Maybe I should get one.... My room does get really hot in the summer time.
veedubfreak Golden Master Messages 6,979 May 16, 2008 #19 FWIW, they tested it on a dual core. Lets see some numbers on a q6600 clocked at 3.6ghz and see if it keeps up with the TRUE. Just saw the second link. But it doesnt compare it to anything else.
FWIW, they tested it on a dual core. Lets see some numbers on a q6600 clocked at 3.6ghz and see if it keeps up with the TRUE. Just saw the second link. But it doesnt compare it to anything else.
dhgunit Daemon Poster Messages 690 May 16, 2008 #20 The manlove for the Xigmatek is disgusting me again...... Sure its fine, but so is your ugly girlfriend.
The manlove for the Xigmatek is disgusting me again...... Sure its fine, but so is your ugly girlfriend.