almightyobo In Runtime Messages 241 Apr 15, 2008 #1 I was just wondering which of the two was more accurate, here is a screenshot of both running:
Ste Do not Stare at my Avatar Messages 9,578 Location Upon Gleaning Infinity Apr 15, 2008 #2 I would go with core temp, 19 and 20C seem too low, unless your within a fridge.
OP OP almightyobo In Runtime Messages 241 Apr 15, 2008 #3 well my room is cold Ive just been hearing realtemp was more accurate with the new quads, its only ~5*C difference tho, and neither are in the danger zone
well my room is cold Ive just been hearing realtemp was more accurate with the new quads, its only ~5*C difference tho, and neither are in the danger zone
b1gapl Mod Emeritus Messages 13,044 Location USA Apr 15, 2008 #4 I usually have a few temperature monitors opened. Those two, along with ASUS Probe, and Everest. And which ever is the majority, I keep. Right now, I just have my Everest for monitoring, since it matches with Core and Real Temp.
I usually have a few temperature monitors opened. Those two, along with ASUS Probe, and Everest. And which ever is the majority, I keep. Right now, I just have my Everest for monitoring, since it matches with Core and Real Temp.
Baez Admin / Dev Staff member Messages 6,990 Location Toronto, Canada Apr 16, 2008 #5 I rely on Real Temp more often.
StealthTools Hardware/VB.net/Anti-vir Messages 515 Location TN - Intel, Samsung, and NVIDIA 4 EvR! Apr 17, 2008 #6 LMAO... love the background I always thought Real Temp to be more accurate...
Baez Admin / Dev Staff member Messages 6,990 Location Toronto, Canada Apr 18, 2008 #7 Well the thing is that there is a huge difference for me. Core Temp says each one is running at about 60C while Real Temp says they're around 42C.
Well the thing is that there is a huge difference for me. Core Temp says each one is running at about 60C while Real Temp says they're around 42C.