CrossFire X Performance vs Tri-SLI + release of ATI's Catalyst 8.3

[hmammen]

yeah pretty much.

plus, I wish they had included dual ultras in their tests. The tri sli thing was great, but who has the money to spend 1500 on just their GPUs?

me haha....i am willing to spend that much but i will only if the cards are worth it....so far the 9xxx isnt, so my best bet would be 2 9800GX2s or 2 Ultras....

 

[nOcLuE98]

me haha....i am willing to spend that much but i will only if the cards are worth it....so far the 9xxx isnt, so my best bet would be 2 9800GX2s or 2 Ultras....

well yeah, but three ultras is sorta overkill. I can see two, but not three. But hey, the way your going, you may as well, set some records!

 

[darksideleader]

i see one ultra overkill

 

[nOcLuE98]

maybe...

 

[mgcook]

i see one ultra overkill

i beg to differ

 

[maroon1]

According to that review from anandtech, 9600GT in SLI was as good as CrossFire X.

The only game that CrossFire X performed very well is oblivion, but that just one old game.

 

[veedubfreak]

Overkill and video cards all depend on what size monitor you play on. If you have a 24" or bigger, you NEED a good video card to run the resolution at any decent frame rate.

 

[nOcLuE98]

Overkill and video cards all depend on what size monitor you play on. If you have a 24" or bigger, you NEED a good video card to run the resolution at any decent frame rate.

most deff.