Tech Forum CPU Benchmark.

[KSoD]

///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 39.47
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows Vista

My Vista scores were just 10 seconds more. Of course i didnt kill everything that i could. Still had about 50 processes running when i ran it.

 

[blue4paper]

how long is this test supposed to last? its been on "mathematics" test for like 5 minutes now lol

 

[carnageX]

It should say "Test Complete" on the final line. Open up the "LastResults" text file it generates in wherever you extraced the files to.

 

[blue4paper]

hehe,


///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 43.23
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP
///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 36.17
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP

43, was with like 4 browsers open and my tv, 36 was without the tv. I guess i should try without all the programs.

 

[blue4paper]

///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 43.23
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP
///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 36.17
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP
///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 34.29
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP
///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 36.39
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP
///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 32.99
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP

I had a reboot though between the 34.29 and 36.24

 

[MetalOwns]

Here's my desktop's results:

///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 24.71
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows Vista
///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 24.41
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows Vista

I had some stuff running though. I'll do it again tomorrow without all that crap going.

 

[zedman3d]

Wow, this has really taken off, thanks, im very glad to see its worked for everyone thats used it. Perhaps making it more clear that its ended is a good start for the next version.

Thank you to all that have tried, so far:

18.93 (by CarnageX with his Intel e6750 @ 3.53GHz) is the time to beat. *Awaits OC'd Quad to pwn all... lol.* (I'm also pretty surprised that in some cases vista added 10 seconds which is like 1/3 of the entire score... lol.)

 

[Schecters]

Here's my desktop results:

///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 21.35
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP
///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 21.33
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP
///// TechForums CPU Bench v0.2
Total Execute Time (Less is better): 21.32
Additional: x86 / 2 / Windows XP

Her laptop is a 2.0 GHz amd turion single core with 1 gig of ram. Haha. It's results were quite the opposite of what I expected. My machine's not that great and I got decent scores too. Hmm.

 

[zedman3d]

Hmm, what would be another contributing factor??? The only thing i can think of is ram speed, but i doubt its enough to make that big a difference. I dont think your score is completely wrong for a 4200, but still something fishy, is it OC'd?

 

[gurusan]

is this program multithreaded?