Graphics card Rankings

[aaronkupen]

a) Why isn't the hd 3 series represented yet?
b) I didn't think 1 GB versions of the g92 gts were available yet.

 

[veg1992]

they are not.. but I'll add them.. and I forgot about the hd3870's.. but I can throw them in..

 

[nOcLuE98]

a) Why isn't the hd 3 series represented yet?
b) I didn't think 1 GB versions of the g92 gts were available yet.

yeah, I saw that 1gb and I got all excited.. darn...

 

[Invisible]

i thought the 2900pro was better than the 8800gts 320mb

 

[TheEnd187]

you failed to include the multi gpu cards from ATI. Or are you only listing available models?

 

[hmammen]

good job vernon...that list looks complete and up to date.

 

[Sora]

I'm waiting a little longer to make any changes just yet....i always wait a couple weeks after cards are released to take a close look.

 

[BiGyLiLuPdAmIdL]

thanks man, you're really helpful, but ****, you got too much free time on your hands, haha

 

[maroon1]

Actually, 8800GTS 320MB is slightly faster than both HD2900pro and HD3850 (256MB), if you compare them stock vs stock

EDIT:

Here is a review for 8800GTS 320MB vs HD3850 256MB
AMD's Radeon HD 3850 and 3870 graphics cards - The Tech Report - Page 5

8800GTS have better average performance

 

[gurusan]

It outperforms the 320mb as well quite a bit though.

Also if you look at that benchmark something is wack...a 320mb 8800GTS outperforming an 8800GT ???

There are even a few cases where the 256mb 3850 outperforms the 256mb 8800GT