So far everyone has encountered a 450 FSB wall on the q9450 which puts it at 3.6ghz...about equivalent to a 4.0ghz q6600 so not bad, but the wall is still a shame.
So far everyone has encountered a 450 FSB wall on the q9450 which puts it at 3.6ghz...about equivalent to a 4.0ghz q6600 so not bad, but the wall is still a shame.
So far everyone has encountered a 450 FSB wall on the q9450 which puts it at 3.6ghz...about equivalent to a 4.0ghz q6600 so not bad, but the wall is still a shame.
Well remember, they did this test on a QX9650 with x8 multiplier to emulate the Q9450, however, remember that the current Yorkfields are affected by an FSB frequency integrity bug. Hopefully they'll fix this issue by time of release and we can easily see 500 fsb which'll translate into a satisfying 4.0GHz, if not more. Remember it might get delayed till February.