uhhhhh. what? i mean is....
onboard memory controller is exclusive to AMD. ie intel cant get it down, which is why they still use a FSB...or is it "just not that important (according to intel lol)"?
uhhhh intel cant place both their chips on the same die.
thanks for contributing/ lol/
AMD has sunk loads of time and money into their new lineup, i'll be surprised if it doesnt surprise me.
as far as what veedub says...
when did intel have an onboard MC?
as far as being way behind, how is that possible if AMD is putting forth true advancement in technology, instead of a simple die shrink, etc (yes i know there's more to it than that, just a general statement...but no true INNOVATION on intels part)...?