core#0 and core#1 temp lower than cpu???

[advancedgeek]

In everest and coretemp they both show the same thing but i want to know if any of you guys have similar temp as mine. I heard from b1gapl that the cpu temp should be lower than core#0 and core#1. specs are on the sig.

 

[SYL\X/3K]

In everest and coretemp they both show the same thing but i want to know if any of you guys have similar temp as mine. I heard from b1gapl that the cpu temp should be lower than core#0 and core#1. specs are on the sig.

huh?

core 1/2 have only 1 Temp because its only 1 cpu

 

[peterhuang913]

You mean only one core

 

[advancedgeek]

i meant that my E6320 is a dual core in a single die(cpu). so the temp reading will tell me the temps of cpu, core#0 and core#1. but b1gapl said his cpu temp is lower than the core temp which i am getting the opposite. So i am wondering if this is ok and asking you guys if any of you have similar temp like mine.

 

[advancedgeek]

bump!

 

[veg1992]

why are you worrying?

its not that bad.. and its not gonna effect your overclock in anyway.. try speedfan and see what it says...

 

[advancedgeek]

it is the same but why is it different? and which should i trust or use as my real cpu temp?

 

[saltynay]

The only truly reliable way is to use the bios for temps. aslong as you don't go over 60-70C in a long term stress test you will be fine

 

[advancedgeek]

but in the bios it only shows the cpu temp not the core#0 and core#1

 

[Apokalipse]

use a program called Core Temp. I think it's the most accurate temperature reading program.