baron5 Fully Optimized Messages 2,984 Location Australia Sep 3, 2007 #11 whoa really. i never new we could only see like 74 fps
Merkwürdigeliebe Benevolent Cake Despot Messages 1,733 Location Montreal, CANADA Sep 3, 2007 #12 tell me about it, modern ram and graphics cards run at higher frequencies than the processors of 2 or 3 years ago...
tell me about it, modern ram and graphics cards run at higher frequencies than the processors of 2 or 3 years ago...
gurusan Golden Master Messages 6,562 Location Portland, OR Sep 3, 2007 #13 That GPU is for workstation use...not gaming.
K khan008 In Runtime Messages 474 Location ... Sep 3, 2007 #14 hmm that would cost as much as both my kidneys
baron5 Fully Optimized Messages 2,984 Location Australia Sep 3, 2007 #15 khan.... ur back. how long u been back for?
K khan008 In Runtime Messages 474 Location ... Sep 3, 2007 #16 been busy, tooo much stuff going on in my life
K khan008 In Runtime Messages 474 Location ... Sep 3, 2007 #18 thanks, im posting these messges on my ps3
san21893 Uber Sanoob Techie Messages 634 Location Westchester County, New York Sep 3, 2007 #19 I also always thought it was around 60fps to the naked eye.
Ronnie Console Gamer Messages 2,716 Location N. Carolina Sep 3, 2007 #20 Khan ever get pics of your rig?