A ag3 Fully Optimized Messages 1,536 Jun 14, 2004 #1 Is there a difference between the two? Besides 200 Mhz less.
T The Merlin Daemon Poster Messages 1,432 Jun 14, 2004 #4 Well, the 3000+ is really bottom of the bucket for AMD64's, so I wouldn't wanna go any farther down..... The 3000+ has a hard enough time just beating the P4's
Well, the 3000+ is really bottom of the bucket for AMD64's, so I wouldn't wanna go any farther down..... The 3000+ has a hard enough time just beating the P4's
S slvrstang Daemon Poster Messages 754 Jun 15, 2004 #5 the 3200+ will beat P4 even at 3.4Ghz just not the 3.4 EE P4 overall both very good processors but i think the 1600Bus speed helps a little
the 3200+ will beat P4 even at 3.4Ghz just not the 3.4 EE P4 overall both very good processors but i think the 1600Bus speed helps a little
T The Merlin Daemon Poster Messages 1,432 Jun 15, 2004 #6 slvrstang said: the 3200+ will beat P4 even at 3.4Ghz just not the 3.4 EE P4 overall both very good processors but i think the 1600Bus speed helps a little Click to expand... Yeah, personally I wouldn't wanna go lower then the 3200+
slvrstang said: the 3200+ will beat P4 even at 3.4Ghz just not the 3.4 EE P4 overall both very good processors but i think the 1600Bus speed helps a little Click to expand... Yeah, personally I wouldn't wanna go lower then the 3200+
S slvrstang Daemon Poster Messages 754 Jun 15, 2004 #7 *nod* 3200 is a great processor....too bad about the non-dual channel ram thing...it sux..i just found out about that....AFTER i bought my new rig
*nod* 3200 is a great processor....too bad about the non-dual channel ram thing...it sux..i just found out about that....AFTER i bought my new rig